Jim was my first adult DM, running a game for my highschool age group because my good buddy Dave was his brother-in-law. And while Jim may have ran a sadistic killer campaign (he was the DM who decided to troll-rape a PC of mine), I learned a heckuva lot about DMing from him. One thing Jim taught me is that you can give the players wide latitude when building PCs and still run a tight ship. One of the ways he did this was by basically allowing 2 different sets of rules at the game table. On his side of the screen he stuck close to the core books and a few minor additions of his own, while the players cobbled together all sorts of mishmashed combinations of unofficial races and classes. And it worked, largely because of the cool air of detachment Jim maintained. He didn't care what sort of freaks we ran, there were two black puddings in the next room no matter what kind of character opened the door. This is what I sometimes call the "objective" approach to DMing. Under this method the Dungeon Master aligns his forces, builds his dungeons, and maps out his world with absolutely no consideration of what PCs or players will be interacting with it. To some that sounds like apathy but it really is an old school virtue. When we kicked in doors and threw down with monsters the players all knew that we weren't being treated like kids. We went up against the same kind of opposition that Jim's adult players faced. We lost a lot, but when we won the victory belonged solely to us.
Sometimes I still cringe when I look at experience point charts that are weighted based upon player levels or modules with great attention paid to Encounter Levels. To me it smacks a little of hand-holding the PCs. I miss the grand old days of vast and unwieldy outdoor encounter charts loaded with monsters too tough for your PCs to handle. Sure, stumbling into a two-hundred strong gnoll war party can cramp your style, but when you beat them the glory is boundless. That actually happened to us in Jim's campaign. We were around 5th level or so. As I recall I was playing Chester of the Pointy Hat, a magic-user. We fought so long I completely ran out of spells and spent a dozen rounds poking gnolls with my wee little dagger. The party archer ran out of arrows. Our side won the battle against overwhelming odds with only a handful of hit points left between us. The fact that it was a completely unfair random encounter only gave that fight more meaning to us. We took the worse Jim's world had to offer and came out of it alive.
- American Racing : Compete for stock-car dominance on 12 different tracks in this power-packed racing game. Free Online Car Games from ...
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Popular Posts
-
The Star Wars Heromachine toy solved a problem for me. I needed a character sketch for one of my PCs for my upcoming Encounter Critical c...
-
Spongebob and Squidward held a jet ski match,you can choose the hero you like,and try your best to win the first prize.come on!
-
Me: How's it hanging? God: I am fine, thank you. Me: I hear your birthday is coming up. God: Who is saying my birthday is coming up?...
-
The prince of the fruit Kingdom fell in love with the princess of enemy country. they have no alternatives, the prince and the princes...
-
Honestly, now that I've seen the Tyranid codex in all its "glory", I think it's time for me to say it: I think Games Work...
-
Royal Spartans! Summer's been pretty dry for in terms of minis, but I have been playing a lot of computer games. Right now, I'm pla...
-
In D&D as I have known it for 20+ years most combat encounters go to a definite conclusion, mostly the death of one side in the conflict...
-
I'm probably going to get thrashed for saying this; but I think Dark Eldar are going to be a master-class army. I've read through t...
-
Looks like it's a write-off guys! You guys probably know that I like Phil Kelly's writing and design philosophies, but I have really...
No comments:
Post a Comment